Customer is using our WAS platform for various web app scans. Upon the report generation, they are finding some gaps in the way the "VULNs" are reported, without a "persistence" record, but instead, with just generic "VULN-1, VULN-2, VULN-X", but doesn't tie back to a unique value.

Essentially, when Xcel runs the scan, and then generates the PDF report, they are provided with generic “VULN-1, “VULN-2,” VULN-X” information, but doesn’t tie it back to a specific finding. This isn’t consistent across the same app; for example, one scan might say “VULN-1” for a finding, but then becomes a “VULN-4” on the next scan/report. The findings do supply a unique “hash” value for the result, so he’s wondering if that can be used/defined somewhere better in the UI.